Skip to content

Is Barack Obama Telling Us That He Wants a Raise?

This post is best begun with a YouTube clip (be patient its a bit slow to load). Watch:

I have to point out the stark difference between Barack Obama’s bumbling, backtracking and general verbosity and John McCain’s conciseness of response– this difference is due in large part to the fact that while John McCain has principles (even though I disagree with many of them), Barack Obama has none– at least no consistent ones. But this is to be expected. John McCain has led a life of public service, and Obama hasn’t even finished his first term in the Senate.

If you watched the clip, you’d know that the Junior Senator said that answering the question of when a baby gets human rights is “above his pay grade.” In other words, he doesn’t know. He doesn’t know? A one-year old is a baby– does he have human rights? Of all the things that he could’ve said, this was the dumbest.

Strange words coming from the most liberal, pro-human rights candidate in history. Do you think the folks who presented him with the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Award feel a bit… awkward?

But Obama has had plenty to say on the issue of Human Rights; here are some highlights.

At the Council on Foreign Relations in 2004:

In every region of the globe, our foreign policy should promote traditional American ideals: democracy and human rights

Yes, but how, under your leadership, can the US promote Human Rights when you don’t even know at what point people get them? Lets move on. At the ‘Citizen of the World’ speech in Berlin:

Will we stand for the human rights of the dissident in Burma, the blogger in Iran, or the voter in Zimbabwe?

I don’t know Barry, how can we, under your leadership, if the question of whether they deserve them at all is ‘above your pay grade’?

But Obama did not think that it was above his pay grade in 2001 as a state senator, when he voted against the infanticidal Born Alive Infants Bill, which would require that a child that has been born and has survived an abortion to receive the same care as a child that was born prematurely; Obama would rather the baby be left to die. Ironically, Obama made substantially less money then than he does now: maybe his standards went up?

Perhaps Senator Obama does not realize that as president of the United States, he’ll be making decisions that effect the lives of millions of people, including the unborn. If that question is above his pay grade, then –in all seriousness– maybe he should apply for another job. If I had been Rick Warren, I would have stopped him before he continued into his bloated elaboration, and I would have asked him, “Senator, if its above your pay grade to answer that question, do you believe your daughters have human rights?”

3 Comments

  1. pragmaticallypolitical wrote:

    The question had nothing to do with human rights, it was a question on abortion. McCain answered the question clearly and confidently because being a pro-life candidate in an evangelical environment is ideal. Obama, who is avowedly pro-choice, wanted to avoid the scientific debate over “life” beginning at conception, 2nd trimester, 3rd trimester, or birth.He isn’t a scientist or a theologian and it would be absurd for him to assert an answer with SECULAR certainty. The deeply religious can use the Bible as a defense to make claims. Those without those guarantees must hedge their bets.
    He didn’t say that human rights apply to all birthed human beings because it is blatantly obvious. He could have said “life begins at birth”, but he might want to reserve the right to oppose partial-birth abortion. I really hope you don’t actually believe that Barack Obama would question the rights of a 2 year old child in the US or abroad.

    Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 11:01 am | Permalink
  2. bpoi wrote:

    Mike, you are a concrete-bound literalist. Of course I’m not saying that Barack Obama doesn’t actually know when people get human rights… My blog post was merely documenting his inconsistency.

    Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 1:55 pm | Permalink
  3. Mike Riley wrote:

    I think that we should take his words at face value, I believe that he literally doesn’t know when a child recieves human rights, this is a deep question that isn’t really easy to answer for many people. I think Obama was telling the truth when he said that the answer to that question was “above his paygrade”, because there is no concrete answewr to the question, no clear cut response that is correct, and as a politician why is he supposed to be able to provide one? These things need to be left to theologans, philosophers, scientists large groups of people from all walks of life need to come together to determine a solution. Barack Obama may someday facilitate that discussion, but nobody expects that he’ll be the man providing the answers.

    Mike Riley’s last blog post..Hey, let’s give Palin the nuclear codes, she’s a capable person.

    Wednesday, October 15, 2008 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*
FireStats icon Powered by FireStats